Why Domestic Revenue Matters More Than Aid

Domestic revenue provides predictability that aid cannot guarantee. Aid flows are shaped by donor priorities, geopolitical shifts, and global economic cycles, all of which lie outside national control. This volatility makes long-term budgeting difficult and exposes development plans to external disruptions.

In contrast, domestically raised revenue allows governments to plan with confidence. When a state knows what it can reliably collect, it can commit to multi-year investments in health systems, education quality, infrastructure maintenance, and social protection areas that require continuity rather than short-term injections.

Revenue Mobilization and Development Capacity

A limited revenue base directly constrains development outcomes. When domestic revenue remains modest, governments face difficult trade-offs between essential services. Spending on hospitals competes with classrooms; infrastructure expansion competes with public sector wages; maintenance competes with new projects.

This constraint explains why growth does not always translate into better services. Even when the economy expands, weak revenue capture means public services remain underfunded, reinforcing inequality and slowing human capital development.

Aid vs Accountability: The Governance Dimension

Domestic revenue strengthens the social contract between the state and citizens. When people contribute financially through taxes, they expect value in return better services, transparency, and accountability. This relationship forces governments to improve performance and governance standards.

Aid weakens this feedback loop when it becomes a substitute for taxation. When governments rely heavily on external financing, accountability shifts outward to donors rather than inward to citizens. Over time, this can dilute democratic pressure and weaken institutional responsiveness.

The Narrow Tax Base Problem

Tanzania’s tax burden remains concentrated on a relatively small segment of the economy. Formal wage earners, compliant businesses, and a limited set of large taxpayers carry a disproportionate share of the fiscal load.

Meanwhile, large economic spaces remain lightly taxed or poorly integrated into the revenue system. The informal sector, digital commerce, small-scale trade, and segments of natural resource value chains often operate at the margins of effective taxation, limiting revenue potential and creating perceptions of unfairness.

Informality, Compliance, and Trust

Tax compliance is not just a technical issue; it is a trust issue. When businesses and individuals perceive public services as weak or unfair, their willingness to pay taxes declines. Informality becomes a rational survival strategy rather than deliberate evasion.

Strengthening revenue, therefore requires improving service delivery alongside enforcement. Citizens are more likely to comply when they see roads maintained, clinics stocked, schools functioning, and public funds managed transparently.

Domestic Revenue and Policy Independence

Revenue autonomy translates directly into policy independence. Governments that finance their budgets domestically have greater freedom to set priorities aligned with national goals rather than donor frameworks.

This independence is especially critical for strategic sectors. Industrial policy, agricultural transformation, social protection, and climate adaptation all require long-term, nationally driven financing that aid alone cannot reliably support.

Takeaways

Expanding the tax base is more sustainable than raising tax rates, as it spreads the burden fairly and supports compliance.

Improving public service delivery is central to strengthening tax morale, trust, and voluntary compliance.

Integrating informal, digital, and resource-linked economic activities into the tax system is essential for long-term fiscal resilience.

Domestic revenue is not just a budget issue; it is the foundation of economic sovereignty, accountability, and development independence.